Re: GoAsm And EasyCode

On Feb 28, 2:18 am, Betov <b...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
"Jim Carlock" <anonym...@xxxxxxxxx> écrivait news:45e50686$0$18925
$4c368...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

I ended up getting the GoAsm version up and running,

Lucky you: I never succeeded to tell it where the GoAsm
Files where located. For some strange reason, it refuses
to find out the GoAsm "Includes", after i had configured
them and reports errors that do not exist...

Jim gave a long list of negative things about it. Now you tell of
more troubles. Basically, this thread represents a "bad review" of
EasyCode.

What does "great" mean, here.

In this case, it is a warning! "Stay away from EasyCode!!"

:)

Nathan.

.