Re: GoAsm And EasyCode
- From: Betov <betov@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Feb 2007 07:18:58 GMT
"Jim Carlock" <anonymous@xxxxxxxxx> écrivait news:45e50686$0$18925
$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
I ended up getting the GoAsm version up and running,
Lucky you: I never succeeded to tell it where the GoAsm
Files where located. For some strange reason, it refuses
to find out the GoAsm "Includes", after i had configured
them and reports errors that do not exist...
The GoAsm version had some really wacky syntax going on,
perhaps that's the macros you're refering to...
No. He was refering to the MASM example seen at the Site.
The IDE looks great! The code editor looks great.
:))
This recalls me of Hutch-- saying that MASM is "powerful":
What does "great" mean, here. Details about _what_ you are
considering "great", in the IDE or in the Editor, would help.
I, for example, have considered "great" the way of directly
re-editing the Dialogs, that Ramon implemented, and this
was after having seen this, that i implemented the first:
; Tag Dialog 1
.... inside RosAsm. Good ideas are good ideas. But "great"...
Betov.
< http://rosasm.org >
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: GoAsm And EasyCode
- From: Evenbit
- Re: GoAsm And EasyCode
- References:
- GoAsm And EasyCode
- From: Jim Carlock
- Re: GoAsm And EasyCode
- From: Evenbit
- Re: GoAsm And EasyCode
- From: Betov
- Re: GoAsm And EasyCode
- From: Evenbit
- Re: GoAsm And EasyCode
- From: Jim Carlock
- GoAsm And EasyCode
- Prev by Date: Re: GoAsm And EasyCode
- Next by Date: Re: GoAsm And EasyCode
- Previous by thread: Re: GoAsm And EasyCode
- Next by thread: Re: GoAsm And EasyCode
- Index(es):