Re: Ten years later

On Mar 3, 5:38 pm, "sevag.krikor...@xxxxxxxxx"
<sevag.krikor...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 3, 9:57 am, Betov <b...@xxxxxxx> wrote:

Just to make sure that nobody would miss it, I copy & paste, here,
a post, from our famous swindler, Ramball Hide, found at CLAX:

Another inane post Rene.



Nice trick. Now, we will have to wait and see how he will manage to
hyde the name of the effective author. I suppose that this other trick
will be base on the well known fact that the users don't usually read
the licenses, and do not care really much about "who wrote what" when
downloading any tool.

If it's in the license, it's not hidden now, is it Einstein?

Not that the collective developments model, achieved by volunteers
would be any problem, but this is, in no case, the model of HLA:

1) Nobody, but our famous swindler, ever contributed to his packet of
***.

You're the only famous swindler around here. It's not fair to the
other developers of RosAsm to claim that you are the only one to
contribute to that packet of ***. The blame is collective.

2) Collective developments is a well known model, which the only purpose
is to provide something useful for the others, and evidently never to
damage any Language, nor to promote the holly reputation of any
Ramball Hide, as an Assembly expert, who would succeed the impressive
performance of selling himself, without having ever done anything but
stealing other's works, for his own personal glorification.

How so? With all the noise you make around here, YOU are the biggest
seller of HLA.

3) Thomasz Gritszar, the real author of FASM, will finaly get what he had
diserved since day one, with his Anti-GPL and Anti-Ethical license,
that is, having a notorious swindler paying him back with a quite
amusing reply to his original "Troyan Horse" trick:

Idiot. If the license was GPL, it would've prevented Randall from
using the code...HOW??

He was in the hope that playing the durty political trick of providing
his Assembler for such a miss-usage, would finaly drive beginners to
FASM. Unfortunately, Ramball Hide is way more clever than him at this
game, and his "Troyan Horse" is going to vanish into a wet morass, as
usual, at the expense of beginners. Sooner or later, you will hear
Master Pdf saying "... when I wrote HLA V.2..." the very same way
you can hear, nowadays, Hutch--, a pathetic Power Basic Programmer,
saying "... when i wrote MASM32...",
Sevag

I suppose you are a lawyer to talk about the license, right ?

Well...if you are not.. ok..But ... i am. And i wrote the license to
adapt to the legislation of several countries (mind you.. not only US
laws) and still be good enough to make it as better as possible
compatible to the GPL ideals, but without having it´s restrictions.

The license if for usage of RosAsm and it is applied to the generated
apps mainly in what matter the usage. I mean, if a user wants to build
commercial, free, opensource apps with RosAsm, ok.. he can do it
following the rules of the license. When he finishes his app, he can
perfectly use whatever license he wants. (GPL, LGPL, or any private
license he wants).

The license applyes, basically, in 2 ways:

a) Integrated apps, documentations etc, in RosAsm package. The
applyance of RosAsm license is for apps made _for_ RosAsm. I mean,
every application, documentation, etc, made to be distributed with
RosAsm, are rulled accordying to RosAsm license, and it is an
integrating part of the whole project.

b) Non integrated apps on RosAsm package. If the user build his app
with RoAsm and plan to release it under GPL rules, he is perfectly
able to do so. RosAsm license is GPL compatible, allowing the user to
release his app under GPL (as long as he agrees to obbey the GPL
rules, of course). This is why we have 2 licenses in RosAsm. One for
developments (RPL as you called), other for allowing users to
distribute his apps under GPL.

Is RosAsm dual-license ? Technically speaking..No. RosAsm is not dual
license. It have his own license, that is compatible with another one.
But, there is no problem people thinking on it as a dual license app,
since it´s applyance allows both licenses.

So, when programming in RosAsm, you can be either a developer or a
user. If you are a developer and pretend to have his work integrated
with RosAsm you can do it, following the license rules. If you are a
single user, a company and so on.. you can use rosasm to build your
apps (while building your app, the license rules needs to be observed)
and when you finiosh you can use whatever license you want depending
only of what your goals are (Commercial or not, GPL or not).

Best Regards,

guga


.