Re: cFASM (calling FASM as a C function)

On Apr 3, 11:48 pm, Betov <b...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
"r...@xxxxxxxxxx" <r...@xxxxxxxxxx> écrivaitnews:1175639100.253340.162410@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

I noticed you conveniently side-stepped the point of the post...

You mean to say that you are lost in the argumentations, clown?

Still side-stepping the question?


Well OK, with an IQ under 80, this may be difficult. So:

The topic is about you,

Yes, you talk about me a lot. Sometimes I get the impression you
*worship* me because I'm so often in your thoughts. Thanks for
boosting my ego and keeping me in your conversations around here. As I
am so hungry for attention, you are my biggest feed (/sarcasm).

having stolen FASM

Isn't it funny how *you're* the only one who claims I've stolen FASM?
Why don't you try posting this noise over at the FASM board and seeing
how far you get with it?


because you have faced
the evident fact that you were unable to write any Assembler.

Oh well, believe whatever you want. Do you think that there is a
*single* other person in this newsgroup that believes this comment? Do
you think that by repeating it over and over again you'll ever
convince *anyone* that this statement is true?


I
have relatively few problems with this.

Actually, you seem to have *many* of problems with this. The moment I
off-handedly mentioned I was using a Perl script to convert FASM
source code to HLA over in CLAX you've been working overtime posting
stuff around here. As I've said a couple of times now, if I'd known
that merging HLA and FASM would have caused you so much distress, I
would have done it years ago :-). If you *really* had few problems
with this, we wouldn't be seeing the posting activity from you.

Just stop introducing
yourself as an Assembly expert,

Please post the URL where I've introduced myself as an "assembly
expert."


an Assembler's Author,

While you're at it, how often to I introduce myself as an "assembler's
author"? *YOU* seem to be the one reminding everyone that I've
written HLA. I haven't had much of a need (other than this post to
answer you ridiculous statements) to make that claim in a long time.

an
Assembly "teacher",

And I very *rarely* introduce myself as an "assembler teacher." When
questions are brought up about the subject, I do clarify that I was a
lecturer at UC Riverside and Cal Poly Pomona. That's hardly
"introducing myself" as an assembly teacher.



and so on...

Oh, you missed a big one: I *do* introduce myself as the author of
AoA. Far more often than the other things you've mentioned.

There is no problem with being
a nobody, you know:

I look at you and I see lots of problems.

There are tons of nobodies who can prefectly
survive, without stealing others' ideas, others' works and others'
researches.

Yes, these people are called "stupid".
If you are too stupid to consider the research of the people who've
come before you, to take advantage of open source code placed in
public forums for you to use, then you are *incredibly* stupid. A
prime example is how you reverse-engineered the PE/COFF file format
even though documentation on the subject was readily available. That's
an example of stupidity.

If there isn't a good reason for writing code over from scratch, it's
stupid to do so. Even if there are good reasons, if you can get a
product out much faster and then go back and then write an improved
version later, it's stupid not to take advantage of existing code.

The reason "nobodies" such as yourself never produce much is because
you're so busy re-inventing the wheel that you never make much
progress. For example, when do we get these "Wizards" you've been
promising us for seven years? When is your disassembler going to
deliver on its promises? Now had you done something like taken
advantage of an existing open-source disassembler (E.g., Ben's), you'd
probably be much farther along and have a product that is actually
useful. Believe it or not, you are *not* the world's premier source
of great disassembler ideas, despite your past claims. The sooner you
recognize that other people's ideas, works, and researches are likely
better than your own, and you start to use that information, the
sooner you will start producing better products.
hLater,
Randy Hyde

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: HLA v1.90 is now available on Webster
    ... FASM is a good Assembler written by a guy called Thomasz Gritszar. ... FASM's code easier to read than the RosAsm source code, ... HLA is an absurd HLL Pre-Parser ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: When to use Rosasm, when to use Masm?
    ... > One person's bloat is another man's essential features... ... coded they are...for example, with better macros and assembler features, ... source code" as anything but the roughest of rough measures because it's ... >> to pretend there's more code in RosAsm than there really is, ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: HLA v1.93 is now available
    ... dialect of x86 assembly to clean up the source code. ... US christian dement, a MicroSoft supporter, and MASM supporter ... been shown several times in the form of the Lisa Assembler that Randy ... Randy already mentioned that at least 60% of HLA 2.00 already ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: Win32 help
    ... > is no CPU instruction. ... > an executable program from this source code. ... just about any assembler that supports linking. ... libraries. ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: Win32 help
    ... source code you have to specify what this "something else" is. ... > And compiler which calls itself an HLA compiler can translate the ... complete assembler source code. ... libraries such as the HLA Standard Library are linkable against ...
    (alt.lang.asm)