Re: Where, oh where, is Frank
- From: "cr88192" <cr88192@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 10:12:50 +1000
"Betov" <betov@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:XnF9920B1B356000betovfreefr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"cr88192" <cr88192@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> écrivait
news:dc0ad$46335b5f$ca83a8d6$22922@xxxxxxxxxx:
I say, a person should marry first, otherwise they live in a state of
immorality.
so, someone like you might call someone like me repressed,
? "call" ? No, i do not "call" you: You evidently _are_.
one is repressed in some ways, maybe.
one needs consider the costs though.
wheras
someone like me might accuse someone like you of being perverse and
immoral (can't say if you actually behave this way, but clearly this
can be said about these attitudes).
Even though perversions may be of interrest, in matter of sexuality,
i never saw any moral in my ***, nor in my sexual pleasure. Moral
is something in the head, you know. Like, for example, what has been
pushing me to work for free for others, these last ten years, or
what has driven me in prison, when i was young, and refusing to go
to the army.
the point is, one lives life as how they live life, within its associated
bounds.
it is not a good thing to live a life filled with perversions (just as it is
similarly bad to base ones' life around, say, drugs or violence, or to focus
on things such as personal gain, wellbeing, or enjoyment).
Now, the fact that you are victim of a kind of "sex-moral", is a
social phenomenon having zero relationship with any kind of real
ethic. This is just the natural flow of some oppressive religious
dementia, probably a christian one, where life is the ennemy, or,
better said, where the religion is, like any religious's criminal
group concept, the ennemy of life and of humanity.
life and humanity are not the problem.
some people are a lot more concerned over these matters than I am though,
and some religions are far more opressive than others.
say, if I were islamic, I would be promoting corporal punishment or
execution for these things, but I am not. I am not even a fundamentalist,
who would try to demand legal anti-promiscuity measures (anti-fornication
and anti-sodomy laws).
the reason I feel, is that they do not make a difference, even if they
prevent the activity. if a person does not submit under their own will, then
it is pointless to try to force them.
I say, simply, that these are bad things to do (one should consider
carefully the things of which they make themselves guilty).
note that I am not without guilt by any means, but my guilt lies elsewhere.
You are a deseased animal, and, sorry, i do not have the medication.
:))
in death, all will be revealed for what it is...
Betov.
< http://rosasm.org >
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Where, oh where, is Frank
- From: Betov
- Re: Where, oh where, is Frank
- References:
- Where, oh where, is Frank
- From: Charles Crayne
- Re: Where, oh where, is Frank
- From: Reginald Simpson
- Re: Where, oh where, is Frank
- From: cr88192
- Re: Where, oh where, is Frank
- From: Evenbit
- Re: Where, oh where, is Frank
- From: cr88192
- Re: Where, oh where, is Frank
- From: Frank Kotler
- Re: Where, oh where, is Frank
- From: cr88192
- Re: Where, oh where, is Frank
- From: Betov
- Re: Where, oh where, is Frank
- From: cr88192
- Re: Where, oh where, is Frank
- From: Betov
- Where, oh where, is Frank
- Prev by Date: Re: HLA v1.93 is now available
- Next by Date: Re: Where, oh where, is Frank
- Previous by thread: Re: Where, oh where, is Frank
- Next by thread: Re: Where, oh where, is Frank
- Index(es):