Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?

hutch--,

I sure do hutch, however I reject your characterization of my
arguments. I write what I believe, not necessarily what someone else
believes. So let's have at it. I think I can give as good as I get,
especially from you.

"hutch--" <hutch@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1180579899.638545.218930@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Poor Ratch is feeling a little left out of it because he made such a
pest of himself in the masm forum that I have suspended his membership
for the forseeable future.

Since hutch could not back up his assertions and pronouncements, he has
resorted to censorship to "protect" his members from "republican neo-con
dogma". For background, the links are here until hutch decides to delete
them. http://www.masm32.com/board/index.php?topic=7350.0
http://www.masm32.com/board/index.php?topic=7329.0


While I certainly don't provide high speed
English bandwidth as a vehicle for clapped out neo-con dogma for an
American president that has under 30% support in his own country, i
would hate to see poor Ratch left completely out of it with his
approach to "Hopeless Pedantics" so I have started a topic where he
cannot spam the masm forum and I cannot suspend his membership.

I am sure that the text messaging is really putting a strain on your
"English bandwidth". What is spam to you are cogent answers from me.


Now on a level playing field, here are the assertions poor Ratch has
so much difficulty with.

Don't be too patronizing too soon.


1. Bush lied to start a war.

Hutch never provided proof on this one. Just a false pronouncement
repeated from the far-left fringe with no backup. True, Bush was mistaken
about WMDs, as were a lot of other people and intelligence services. But a
lie needs intent to be a lie, and no one including hutch has proven intent.
Oh, and "everyone knows it" does not hack it.

2. Young Americans are still dying for no purpose at all in sh*tholes
like Afghanistan and Iraq.

More nonsense. In Afghasnistan they chased out the Taliban once,
thereby allowing women could go to school again, and gave the people a
chance to govern themselves instead of being under the control of a
religious theocracy. In Iraq they got rid of Sadamn for good, and gave the
people a chance to make something of their country. Too bad they seem more
interested in settling old scores by killing each other, and anyone else
trying to stop them from doing so instead of cooperating to form a
government.

3. Funding two unwinnable wars has turned the US economy into a
shambles.

A laughable observation. I live here and I sure don't see any
financial shambles. Looking at too many far-left websites, Hutch?

4. The level of foreign financial debt is compromising US security
with its massive debt to China and Japan.

It was at a high level long before the Iraq invasion, and it would
probably still be high without the invasian. True, that is not a good
thing, but China and Japan would be in a bad situation if the US could not
pay them back on time. And still Japan and China allow the US credit. Do
they think they will be payed off after all?


Come on Ratch, get out of hopeless denial and try and comprehend the
massive quantity of available evidence that support these assertions.

If there is massive evidence, I sure am not seeing it from you. Ratch


.