Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- From: Betov <betov@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 May 2007 06:20:50 GMT
hutch-- <hutch@xxxxxxxxx> écrivait news:1180579899.638545.218930
@x35g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
Poor Ratch is feeling a little left out of it because he made such a
pest of himself in the masm forum that I have suspended his membership
for the forseeable future.
Not exactly true. Even though, Ratch is evidently a criminal, you did
it because he was in another opinion than yours. Period.
There have been way more scandalous actions on the Board that is under
your control, like, for example, a guy showing the Isrealian flag as
an avatar, without any protestation from anybody (but me, of course).
Betov.
< http://rosasm.org >
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- From: Frank Kotler
- Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- From: hutch--
- Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- References:
- HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- From: hutch--
- HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- Prev by Date: Re: GRUB master boot record
- Next by Date: Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- Previous by thread: Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- Next by thread: Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- Index(es):