Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- From: /\\\\o//\\annabee </o//annabee@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 11:35:12 +0200
På Thu, 31 May 2007 06:54:41 +0200, skrev Ratch <watchit@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
1. Bush lied to start a war.
Hutch never provided proof on this one. Just a false pronouncement
repeated from the far-left fringe with no backup. True, Bush was mistaken
about WMDs, as were a lot of other people and intelligence services. But a
lie needs intent to be a lie, and no one including hutch has proven intent.
Oh, and "everyone knows it" does not hack it.
go somewhere and *** yourself, moron.
--
10cc nomore :))
Suck on that dickwad :))
.
- References:
- HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- From: hutch--
- Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- From: Ratch
- HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- Prev by Date: Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- Next by Date: Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- Previous by thread: Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- Next by thread: Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- Index(es):