Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- From: /\\\\o//\\\\annabee <Wannabee@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 12:38:06 +0200
På Thu, 31 May 2007 12:27:39 +0200, skrev Betov <betov@xxxxxxx>:
hutch-- <hutch@xxxxxxxxx> écrivait news:1180603063.813480.130070
@n15g2000prd.googlegroups.com:
Are you sure you
did not work for the Vichy in your youth ?
Yes. For two reasons:
1) I was not born.
rebirth ?
:)
2) I don't drink water.
:)
Betov.
< http://rosasm.org >
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- From: hutch--
- Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- From: Betov
- Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- From: hutch--
- Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- From: Betov
- Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- From: hutch--
- Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- From: Betov
- Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- From: hutch--
- Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- From: Betov
- HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- Prev by Date: Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- Next by Date: Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- Previous by thread: Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- Next by thread: Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- Index(es):