Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- From: /\\\\o//\\annabee </o//annabee@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 16:31:23 +0200
På Thu, 31 May 2007 16:05:16 +0200, skrev Betov <betov@xxxxxxx>:
/\\\\o//\\annabee </o//annabee@xxxxxxxxxxxx> écrivait
op.ts60hjekk3qojy@timmy2:">news:op.ts60hjekk3qojy@timmy2:
it actually seem to refer to "Born again Christianity". :)))
"
Now there was a Pharisee named Nicodemus, a leader of the Jews. He
came to Jesus by night and said to him, "Rabbi, we know that you are
a teacher who has come from God; for no one can do these signs that
you do apart from the presence of God." Jesus answered him, "Very
truly, I tell you, no one can see the kingdom of God without being
born again." Nicodemus said to him, "How can anyone be born after
having grown old? Can one enter a second time into the mother's womb
and be born?" Jesus answered, "Very truly, I tell you, no one can
enter the kingdom of God without being born of water and/or
Spiritus." "
My sinsere applogies in advance. :)))
:))
You seem to be missing the dates and the roots. Siddhartha Gautama
life was 500 or 600 years before this. Also, i am surprised that
you could ignore what the "water" is.
I miss allmost anything.
500 before or after. What is that to me?
All of those, either with "God", or without are nothing but the
uneasy small and helpless human, trying to reach of the stars.
Siddhartha, just the same crap, in another form.
There are States of mind. Nothing but this.
States of mind.
And another, and another.
I control my own states of mind.
So for me, Buddartha can go an suck my ***.
Betov.
< http://rosasm.org >
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- From: hutch--
- Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- From: Betov
- Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- From: hutch--
- Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- From: Betov
- Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- From: hutch--
- Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- From: Betov
- Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- From: hutch--
- Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- From: Betov
- Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- From: /\\\\o//\\\\annabee
- Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- From: Betov
- Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- From: /\\\\o//\\annabee
- Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- From: Betov
- HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- Prev by Date: Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- Next by Date: Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- Previous by thread: Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- Next by thread: Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- Index(es):