Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- From: Betov <betov@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 May 2007 18:57:43 GMT
SpooK <keith@xxxxxxxxxxx> écrivait news:1180635598.391307.93440
@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com:
If you mean to answer to Hutch, do not answer to Half.
:))
I used to think those who worshiped your newbie deity position should
eventually come to realize how much of a two-faced prick you are and
therefore avoid such BS. However, I've recently come to realize how
much of a service you are doing by being a newb-magnet to the blind
and mindless masses of wannabe programmers. Hell, I laugh every time I
read your "Current Policy on the old win32asm forum" thread... it is
quite a pompous statement indeed =D
You are essentially filtering out those who don't have the necessary
sense to be effective/useful programmers. Keep up the good work, we at
ASM Community always enjoy getting more of those precious few members,
that come running from your place, who are really worth the investment
in running such a community. Quality > Quantity. Bravo and *thumbs-
up*... keep up the good work... for however many years you have left
on this planet :)
Quite frankly, if you need criminals like Ratch, Donkey, Randall
Hyde and friends, for "running such a community", indeed, the help
of Hutch --, --, --, ... will be also welcome, because, considered
as a Nerds-Parser, the MASM32 Board is a marvelous tool.
And in matter of ridiculous abuses, trying to keep people under
the control of a dictatorship, the fact of having lost the Rats
War Part I, II, III, IV, V and VI did not buy you any right of
ironizing on your winner, while being the Chief-Capo of the
Evil Board.
So, before ironizing on this so pathetic case, go and buy yourself
a conduct: You did a first step into this direction when implementing
64 Bits in NASM. Go ahead silently, because you still have many other
steps to do, before having the advantage of some confortable ethical
sense.
Betov.
< http://rosasm.org >
.
- References:
- HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- From: hutch--
- Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- From: Betov
- Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- From: hutch--
- Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- From: Betov
- Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- From: hutch--
- Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- From: Betov
- Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- From: hutch--
- Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- From: Betov
- Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- From: /\\\\o//\\\\annabee
- Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- From: Betov
- Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- From: /\\\\o//\\annabee
- Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- From: Betov
- Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- From: /\\\\o//\\annabee
- Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- From: Betov
- Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- From: /\\\\o//\\annabee
- Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- From: SpooK
- HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- Prev by Date: Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- Next by Date: Re: Nasm 0.99.01 available
- Previous by thread: Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- Next by thread: Re: HAY RATCH, wanna argue republican neo-con dogma ?
- Index(es):