Re: Processor Manufacturers
- From: Guga <GugaGTG@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 18:58:05 -0000
On May 27, 9:13 am, "r...@xxxxxxxxxx" <r...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 24, 12:15 am, Betov <b...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
RosAsm's Board, is free access and free speech,
Oh Puuulease stop with the free access and free speech nonsense.
You've said yourself on this very forum that you censor posts on your
board.
and the only
individual who ever got ban was Randall Hyde for having posted
repetitive indentical bug reports about a bug that does not exist,
Still have your head in the sand about that defect in your code, eh?
As for the "identical reports", the reason I multi-posted was because
you kept deleting them...
in the hope of instilling doubt in the mind of new commers.
...in hopes that people wouldn't see the defect. Of course, in the
end, after I kept reposting after you deleted the posts, people *did*
see them and *did* verify that the problem existed. Or don't you
recall people telling you on your very forum that they were able to
verify the existence of the bug? A bug, I might point out, that
*still* exists today.
If you "ban" people because they point out defects in your products,
that speaks *volumes* about free speech on your board.
And if you are concerned about "instilling doubt in the mind of new
commers", perhaps you ought to just fix the defect in your code, eh?
hLater,
Randy Hyde
We didn´t ban people for showing bugs....If we did i had to ban.. let
´s see.. myself :):):)
René banned _you_ once for posting several posts on the same subject
when u tried to call some attention to yourself, and not to the
alleged problem. If u had posted only once, you would not get banned.
The banning´s i did this past weeks was _only_ on the spammer bitches.
Deleting and controlling almost 1400 users in 2 days was not at all an
pleasant task to do.
Accidentally i banned 2 or 3 users while i was setting a range of
banned of IPs. Unfortunatelly those ones were on the same range of the
spammers.
Now the board problem is fixed and it is easier to control the
attacks.
Best Regards,
Guga
.
- Prev by Date: Re: ReactOS takes another big hit
- Next by Date: Re: ReactOS takes another big hit
- Previous by thread: Fastest implementation of mod (%) opeartion using bit shift only?
- Next by thread: Re: ATTN: Guga
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
