Re: Rene can't handle AoA's Success


kistjebier said:

Over in CLAX, Rene wrote:

[...]
I don't need to type much yet,
Herbert already said what I fully agree with.
Yeah, just expect them to pick it up like the Einsteins your method
requires them to be you by throwing the Intel/AMD manuals at them. You
already know my stance on the "UTFSRTFM n00b" Linux elitist attitude.

You don't know much about 'my' method of teaching, but your
guessing/assumption may be close anyway.
I see nothing wrong on 'RTFM' before asking undeterminable questions.

why do I feel always thirsty when I read your nick?

By the same token: you don't know much about the HLA way if you quit
after only 2 chapters of AoA. Having a standard library at your
disposal to initially avoid the many pitfalls when learning assembly
programming has in store isn't a valid parameter to wether a certain
approach to leaning asm is a good one or not; it's up to the person
learning asm to gradually drop the lib and accompanying HLL'isms that
decides wether that method worked for him or not.

By using 'standard' or 'whatever' libs you learn nothing at all
about how the machine (CPU&HW) is working.
And without this knowledge a programmer will always remain in the
abstract HLL-world and wont be able to use the instruction-set as
it is designed (as a mechanism for data flow and hardware control).

__
wolfgang

owa jetzt geh i auf a bier ... kaun a a gaunze kisten wern.





.

Loading