Re: Usenet

"Evenbit" <nbaker2328@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1183531117.141122.170440@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jul 2, 12:23 pm, "¬a\\/b" <a...@xxx> wrote:
Usenet, the last free place, is in danger!
do you have seen what happen in |sci.cript#?
it seems there, spam is out of control...

Just be happy that the spam in "sci.cript" gives a nice variety of
subjects to read. The spam we get here in a.l.a keeps promoting the
same two products (High Level Assembly and RosAsm) without end. ;)

"Shine down upon the severed."
"Shine until the two become one."
"Divided Hell, withering away."
"Divided Hell, withering away."
"Shine upon the many."
"Light our way, benevolent son."

Huh? What were you saying? Oh, yeah, the merging of two Hells... and the
need for someone to merge them.

(PS. Sorry for corruption of Jambi lyrics... Ah, nevermind, half the lyrics
are so muffled it could be completely Satanic and no one would ever know for
sure. It's like he's singing through a friggin' sock and duct tape or
something...)

"¬a\/b" <al@xxx> wrote in message
news:1k9i8359p8gvl2gp826i0kpqihaq2n9gep@xxxxxxxxxx
Usenet, the last free place, is in danger!

Obsolete since '93... Like Telenet, dialup BBS', FidoNet, BITNET, Gopher,
telnet, ftp, etc. Replaced by html based Internet forums.

do you have seen what happen in |sci.cript#?

No. "Well, let me roll up on to the sidewalk and take a look. Whoa!"

I do now. Somewhat funny, but who cares? Cryptologists are more obscure
than programmers...

Do they care if their entire NG was "encrypted"? Don't they enjoy
decrypting spam..., um, I mean, "encrypted messages," anyway?

it seems there, spam is out of control...


It's an unmoderated group. There is no control. It can't be out of
control. Anarchy is the default.


Rod Pemberton

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re:
    ... Pack your SPAM where the sun don't shine! ...
    (rec.food.cooking)
  • FrontPage, Spam and malicious results (unknown whether such results are intended)
    ... html editors. ... and do nothing to control anyones computer. ... active x and intrusive e-mail spam. ... >and am uptodate with all Critical Updates except changing ...
    (microsoft.public.security)
  • Re: Q: not bouncing rejects
    ... I don't have complete control over the configuration of the first server ... Even if I put proper spam control on the first server then I couldn't be ... If I don't find a rule based way to archive the rejections (instead of ...
    (comp.mail.sendmail)
  • Re: SPAM Alert
    ... Look f*ckhead, just don't spam here. ... > You are only deleting your post on the MS news server which you ... > MS has no control over what people post to usenet. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: SPAM Alert
    ... Look f*ckhead, just don't spam here. ... > You are only deleting your post on the MS news server which you ... > MS has no control over what people post to usenet. ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.cmdprompt.admin)