Re: Usenet

santosh <santosh.k83@xxxxxxxxx> écrivait news:1184146087.371241.260510
@d30g2000prg.googlegroups.com:

They suggest using hydrogen fuel-cells -- but
what idiot is going to want one of those heavy suckers running their
weed-eater or chainsaw??

They're primarily meant for automobiles, whose emissions far outweigh
those of chain-saws or lawnmowers.


I didn't answer to those absurdities which demonstrate a strange
"lack" of information, but automobiles are no more a problem for
oil substitution. Electric cars _exist_, and we are beyond any
viability demonstration. The only reason why we all do not yet
move in electric cars is that the oil mafia does not want to let
it go, and do their best for locking the construction of electric
cars. Google, for example, on "Blue Car", which exist since many
years... but which you will not be allowed to buy, for the very
simple reason that states do not get the same taxes on electricity
than the income they get from oil. By the way, electricity production
by nuclear centrals is close to zero pollution, but we do not even
need of more nuclear stuff for cars, as long as this kind of energy
usage is typically the one where wind electricity production is the
most accurate.

So, the real issue left is with planes, and the solution to this
problem is not technologic, but _legal_. In other words, the way
to solve it is to establish _laws_ forbidding this so absurd and
so useless way for moving.


Betov.

< http://rosasm.org >




.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Oil Peaked !
    ... We need alternatives to oil, ... Paving the Mojave Desert with solar cells alone would do it. ... Electric cars. ... years to wire all those parking meters with electricity. ...
    (misc.news.internet.discuss)
  • Re: DARPA, at least, has a clue
    ... The reason is that given higher MPG cars, the price of making a trip declines and, surprise, surprise, people drive more. ... which a tad more than 80 comes from oil and oil equivalents. ... We have to be careful here not to conflate oil use, which is primarily for transportation, and other things which are primarily used for heat and electricity generation. ... It also taxes those people who use more than the average amount of gas, but these are the people who would gain the most from taking actions such as buying a more fuel efficient car. ...
    (comp.arch)
  • Re: Why Democrats dont want to lower gas prices
    ... WASHINGTON - A Democratic senator on the Energy and Natural Resources Committee inadvertently ... explained Democrats don't want to increase supplies of oil and gasoline because they want to wean ... We'd still have 5-7 years before anything appeared at the pump, By that time half of America's cars could be electric, if we resolved to give up our oil dependency. ... With half the passenger cars in the US running on electricity, the US no longer has an oil dependency problem, does it? ...
    (misc.news.internet.discuss)
  • Re: Oil Peaked !
    ... We need alternatives to oil, ... Paving the Mojave Desert with solar cells alone would do it. ... Electric cars. ... We don't have to reinvent electricity, ...
    (misc.news.internet.discuss)
  • Re: Ass raped at the pumps Options
    ... Once the general public starts voting with their wallets and buy fuel efficient and/or alternative fuel cars I think the shift will occur quicker than anyone could have imagined. ... Mainly it is economic because China, India and the rest of the Third World will be pressuring the oil markets for decades to come. ... These high gas prices might just be the catalyst to get the ball rolling. ... As the demand for electricity rises -- what will happen to ...
    (rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang)