Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: "rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx" <rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 09:05:42 -0700
On Jul 31, 8:13 am, Betov <be...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
"rh...@xxxxxxxxxx" <rh...@xxxxxxxxxx> écrivaitnews:1185890805.790552.308340@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
Assembler < Compiler < Translator
But the definition is based on the types of "languages" that these
programs work with. Assemblers are compilers whose source language is
an assembly language.
Right, clown. The reason why Assemblers like NASM, RosAsm,
FASM, GoAsm, are Assemblers period, why MASM is a Compiler
for Assembly Language, and HLA an HLL, which, like most
HLLs, passes down obfuscated Assembly.
Once again, you demonstrate that you don't know the difference between
a language and an implementation of a language.
Try again.
hLater,
Randy Hyde
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: Betov
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- References:
- Definitions - What are yours?
- From: CodeMonk
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: santosh
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: Betov
- Definitions - What are yours?
- Prev by Date: Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- Next by Date: Re: New instructions
- Previous by thread: Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- Next by thread: Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|