Re: Definitions - What are yours?

"rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx" <rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx> écrivait
news:1185897881.480729.233650@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

Well, let's see, one the one hand we have the Wikipedia, which
although isn't always known for getting everything right, is a
reviewed source based on the opinions and expertise of many
contributors. On the other hand, we have the self-proclaimed "assembly
expert" Rene Tournois who creates definitions on the fly, largely to
exclude products that compete with his. Whose opinion would you trust?

Yes, we all know that you had the arrogancy of vandalizing
RosAsm Wikipedia's Page. Congratulations. Personnaly, even
though, each one of your word is a scandalous lie, i would
never want to go as deep into the ignominy, as to fix your
lies.

So, you win hands down, on that front line, clown.


Betov.

< http://rosasm.org >




.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The case for physically separated bike lanes
    ... opinions on a website that must mean you also possess expertise on ... own opinions without misstating those of others. ... You are not free to distort my words and you are not free to pretend ...
    (rec.bicycles.misc)
  • Re: I need help explaining basic linguistic concepts to a lay person
    ... I see the problem as Heidi having no understanding ... > of the value of expertise. ... Jayne, it's not so much that I believe all opinions are valid, but rather ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: The Wikipedia FAQK
    ... other people's opinions. ... is something very fallacious about invoking the authority of a famous ... Ellison or Gaiman dislike Wikipedia? ... You don't know what my field of expertise is, ...
    (rec.arts.sf.written)
  • Re: usw meteorological office
    ... > This posting expresses the personal view and opinions of the author. ... we have our own gliding and aviation expertise courtesy of Jack ...
    (uk.sci.weather)
Loading