Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: Betov <betov@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 Jul 2007 16:44:13 GMT
"rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx" <rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx> écrivait news:1185898400.738351.53010
@i38g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
Actually, *all* assemblers are compilers for assembly language.
No clown. "Compilers for assembly language" are tool like MASM,
that break the one to one correspondance. This is not subject to
discussion.
Now, all Assemblers are also "Compilers", in the generic acception
of the word *Compiler*, but this is not, at all, the topic.
Betov.
< http://rosasm.org >
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- References:
- Definitions - What are yours?
- From: CodeMonk
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: santosh
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: Betov
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx
- Definitions - What are yours?
- Prev by Date: Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- Next by Date: Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- Previous by thread: Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- Next by thread: Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|