Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: Betov <betov@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 Jul 2007 17:26:40 GMT
"rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx" <rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx> écrivait
news:1185902178.325848.192460@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
Yes, an assembler is a compiler for an assembly language
No, clown. A Compiler for Assembly Language is a tool that
breaks the one to one correspondance. Therefore it cannot
be an Assembler, as long as this is very exactly, the red
line. And you will *never* succeed to arase this red line,
even if it would please you to break the most accepted and
most self-evident definitions.
Betov.
< http://rosasm.org >
.
- References:
- Definitions - What are yours?
- From: CodeMonk
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: santosh
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: Betov
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: Betov
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx
- Definitions - What are yours?
- Prev by Date: Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- Next by Date: Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- Previous by thread: Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- Next by thread: Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|