Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: Betov <betov@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 Jul 2007 17:37:32 GMT
"rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx" <rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx> écrivait
news:1185902798.294930.28470@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
First all, I never claimed that MASM has a complete superset of FASM's
capabilities. Just that MASM's are better.
I don't care of your opinions, clown. Show us, or shut up.
Perhaps you missed the post in this very newsgroup where I accepted
your challenge and showed you, feature by feature, how to implement
each RosAsm macro feature within MASM.
No, clown. You never did. One of us is a liar. If this is me,
feel free to paste your work. If this is you, just shut up.
In case you would not even recall, this was about the RosAsm
Proc Macros set. Waiting, clown...
Betov.
< http://rosasm.org >
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- References:
- Definitions - What are yours?
- From: CodeMonk
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: santosh
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: Betov
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: Betov
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx
- Definitions - What are yours?
- Prev by Date: Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- Next by Date: Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- Previous by thread: Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- Next by thread: Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|