Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: Betov <betov@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 Jul 2007 17:44:34 GMT
"rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx" <rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx> écrivait
news:1185902798.294930.28470@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
Then explain why RosAsm is an assembler when it supports high-level
assembly features
This is quite easy, clown:
When the user makes use of the Equal Preparser, RosAsm is
no more an Assembler. And, as long as this all is under
user's control, as soon as he does no more use it, it is
an Assembler.
Mind you, clown, we plan to implement a Basic Pre-Parser,
one or other day. When done, when the user will write:
PREPARSE Basic
The user will be using a Basic, and i do not think that
anybody ever said that Basic was Assembly.
Betov.
< http://rosasm.org >
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- References:
- Definitions - What are yours?
- From: CodeMonk
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: santosh
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: Betov
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: Betov
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx
- Definitions - What are yours?
- Prev by Date: Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- Next by Date: Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- Previous by thread: Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- Next by thread: Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|