Re: Definitions - What are yours?

"rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx" <rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx> écrivait
news:1185903120.123089.161270@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

Perhaps you might explain to us what you're talking about?

I am talking about you giving a try to push your remarks
down to absurdity in order to bend logic to what you need
to sell.

Yes, when there are several possible encodings, most Assemblers
choose the smallest one, instead of letting the Programmer
choosing those unsignificant details.

This never made an HLL an Assembler. Try something else, clown.


Betov.

< http://rosasm.org >


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Definitions - What are yours?
    ... I am talking about you giving a try to push your remarks ... down to absurdity in order to bend logic to what you need ... to sell. ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: Definitions - What are yours?
    ... down to absurdity in order to bend logic to what you need ... to sell. ... Yes, when there are several possible encodings, most Assemblers ... what does that have to do with Herbert? ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: A Symbol Table Benchmark
    ... "Randall Hyde" écrivait news:8NUFc.4425 ... >> nothing to prove, nor to sell, nor to claim, ... Facts are facts, Master Pdf: ... RosAsm is the fastest of all the available assemblers. ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: Faster HexToBuffer Routines
    ... Betov wrote: ... other assemblers such as FASM are much faster, then I doubt I'd want to ... You might start by proving that you aren't constantly trying to sell ...
    (alt.lang.asm)