Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: Betov <betov@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 Jul 2007 18:15:39 GMT
"rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx" <rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx> écrivait
news:1185903306.775777.256230@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
please describe the language features in
HLA that could not be implemented using user-written macros. If you
manage to do that, then you will really have accomplished something
Funny.
:)
Well, this is opening a quite amusing door, clown. That is,
if you want to demonstrate that your HLL can do the job of
an Pseudo-Assembler, just post an HLA example and its counter
part in pseudo-Assembly-passed-do-to-FASM, from bottom up. That
is to say, the very same main source, and all the set of user
defined macros that would resolve the *entire* Source.
Good luck, clown.
And do not forget to verify everything carefully, because i
fail to imagine how you could make fully sure that these
are the macros, which are doing all of the job, and not the
HLL, here and there.
By the way, it would be the same dilemna as the one of your
victims, that you deprived of any possibility of ever knowing
where they would be writing "pseudo-inline-Assembly" or pure
HLL.
:))
Betov.
< http://rosasm.org >
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- References:
- Definitions - What are yours?
- From: CodeMonk
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: cr88192
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: Betov
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: Betov
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx
- Definitions - What are yours?
- Prev by Date: Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- Next by Date: Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- Previous by thread: Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- Next by thread: Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|