Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: Betov <betov@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 Jul 2007 18:28:01 GMT
"rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx" <rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx> écrivait
news:1185905913.137607.308430@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
Well, then, by the same token, when a user makes use of one of the
statements you find offensive in HLA, it is no longer an assembler.
But until then, it is an assembler
No, clown. An Assembler can simulate an HLL, but an HLL
cannot be an Assembler, by definition.
Betov.
< http://rosasm.org >
.
- References:
- Definitions - What are yours?
- From: CodeMonk
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: santosh
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: Betov
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: Betov
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: Betov
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx
- Definitions - What are yours?
- Prev by Date: Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- Next by Date: Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- Previous by thread: Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- Next by thread: Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|