Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: "rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx" <rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 12:53:48 -0700
On Jul 31, 11:06 am, Betov <be...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
"rh...@xxxxxxxxxx" <rh...@xxxxxxxxxx> écrivaitnews:1185903306.775777.256230@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
You keep saying the HLA language is not an assembly language, but
invariably you offer no proof of this by explaining those language
features that are not "assembly language" and you always wind up
making some noise about implementation details that have nothing to do
with the language (e.g., "passing stuff on down to FASM").
Not on my fault if you have stolen FASM, because you were unable
to write any Assembler, clown.
Whether I "stole" FASM or not is irrelevant. Including FASM with HLA
is functionally no different than if Tomasz and I had worked together
on HLA or whether I wrote the whole thing myself. The bottom line is
that the language is *still* HLA, which is an assembly language, and
the authorship of the program doesn't change that one bit.
hLater,
Randy Hyde
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: Betov
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- References:
- Definitions - What are yours?
- From: CodeMonk
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: cr88192
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: Betov
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: Betov
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: Betov
- Definitions - What are yours?
- Prev by Date: Re: Help...
- Next by Date: Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- Previous by thread: Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- Next by thread: Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|