Re: Definitions - What are yours?

On Jul 31, 1:32 pm, Betov <be...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
"rh...@xxxxxxxxxx" <rh...@xxxxxxxxxx> écrivaitnews:1185911924.507732.121190@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

I have asked you on many occasions to post some RosAsm example

You have no right of asking me anything, clown.

As a U.S. citizen, covered under the Constitution of the United States
and the associated Bill of *Rights*, I certainly have the right to
free speech, and that includes asking you to post some RosAsm example
that proves your point.

You have the right to *refuse* to provide such examples, but by doing
so you lessen your arguments that HLA is not an assembly language
because you offer no real proof of your claims.


I am not the
one who tries to sell an HLL under the name of Assembler.

No, but you're the one who goes around calling assemblers
"HLLs" (confusing the difference between an assembler and a language,
while you're at it) and you're the one who refuses to offer any
evidence that your claims are correct.

If you're going to claim that the HLA language is a HLL, or that the
HLA v1.x program is not an assembler, you should be prepared to prove
that point. To date, your "proofs" have consisted little more of
claiming that I stole FASM code from Tomasz and that I couldn't write
an assembler on my own. Let me clue you in on one thing, whether or
not HLA is an assembly language has absolutely no relationship to my
ability to write an assembler. If I am unable to write an assembler by
myself, so I enlist someone else to help me, the result is still an
assembler.



There is absolutely nothing symetric, here: I am an Assembler's
author who programs in Assembly on a daily basis

By your own definition you are not an author of an assembler. After
all, RosAsm violates that "holly" (sic) 1:1 correspondance argument
that you use against HLA and MASM.


// you are an
HLL author unable to write anything but in HLL/VHLL.

Well, we'll just let all the code I've written speak for itself.
hLater,
Randy Hyde

.

Relevant Pages

  • HLA History
    ... The Self-proclaimed "assembly language historian" ... High-Level Assembler. ... HLA *has* been around long enough now ... using MASM 6.1. ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: HLA is a text converter (text to object code)
    ... certain translator is an 'assembler' or a 'compiler'. ... A particular HLL doesn't ... I don't mind the HLA variable declarations and function ... programming except 16 bit programming and direct hardware inter- ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: Beginners and All That Are New To Assembly Language - Read This
    ... Now on, HLA is an HLL, and there is no possible ... of the work instead of passing on intermediate code to FASM. ... an argument anymore because removing the problem (the fact that HLA ... HLA assembly and produced machine code, would it be an assembler? ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: TMA Assembler?
    ... I wish I was as good as Rene in ASM, but there is still some way to go, ... i'm wrong) going for HLA while coming from a C background. ... provide an assembly language whose syntax is familiar to HLL ... claiming that HLA is yet another Assembler. ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: Rocket Science
    ... >> Also, logically, if MASM is the underlying assembler being used by ... then MASM must always be being run in addition to HLA so ... the MASM or FASM or whatever underlying assembler's speed into its own ...
    (alt.lang.asm)