Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: "randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 14:11:27 -0700
On Jul 31, 1:48 pm, Betov <be...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
"randyh...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <randyh...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> écrivaitnews:1185914528.527745.107260@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
The fact that I've written
assemblers in the past (e.g., the "LISA" assembler) demonstrates your
first sentence is incorrect.
It iw a well kwnown fact that LISA was a complete failure.
Like everything you could do.
Well, maybe it was. But it *sold* a heck of a lot more copies to users
than you've been able to get giving away your assembler for free. And
given how easy it is to get RosAsm off the internet today (and the
fact that you had to go to a computer store to *buy* LISA), that's
saying something about the failure of your product now, isn't it?
hLater,
Randy Hyde
.
- References:
- Definitions - What are yours?
- From: CodeMonk
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: cr88192
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: Betov
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: Betov
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: Betov
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: Betov
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: Betov
- Definitions - What are yours?
- Prev by Date: Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- Next by Date: Re: NASM HelloWorld - DOS
- Previous by thread: Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- Next by thread: Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|