Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: "randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 13:51:39 -0700
On Jul 31, 11:06 am, Betov <be...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
"rh...@xxxxxxxxxx" <rh...@xxxxxxxxxx> écrivaitnews:1185903306.775777.256230@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
You keep saying the HLA language is not an assembly language, but
invariably you offer no proof of this by explaining those language
features that are not "assembly language" and you always wind up
making some noise about implementation details that have nothing to do
with the language (e.g., "passing stuff on down to FASM").
Not on my fault if you have stolen FASM, because you were unable
to write any Assembler, clown.
It *is* my fault that I chose to save a little time by incorporating
FASM into HLA and that caused you to lose your *only* argument against
HLA that anyone was buying. Why don't you try some of that
"innovation" you were talking about in a different post and come up
with a new story? People aren't buying the "theft" angle, Rene. You
just look silly.
hLater,
Randy Hyde
.
- References:
- Definitions - What are yours?
- From: CodeMonk
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: cr88192
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: Betov
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: Betov
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- From: Betov
- Definitions - What are yours?
- Prev by Date: Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- Next by Date: Re: Help...
- Previous by thread: Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- Next by thread: Re: Definitions - What are yours?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|