Re: Definitions - What are yours?
Albus Severus wrote:
[ ... ]
As an aside, there seems to be no page on Wikipaedia for RosAsm and the
page titled SpAsm is about muscular ones.
It was there a few months ago, when I was looking up the list of x86
assemblers.
.
Relevant Pages
- Re: Time to check out BIOS
... It describes the very beginning basics of writing an OS for an x86 PC. ... You can use other assemblers, linkers, or compilers. ... The as86 syntax is slightly different from other assemblers. ...
(comp.lang.asm.x86) - Re: Time to check out BIOS
... It describes the very beginning basics of writing an OS for an x86 PC. ... You can use other assemblers, linkers, or compilers. ... The as86 syntax is slightly different from other assemblers. ...
(comp.lang.asm.x86) - Re: Used interrupts on both 68k & PIC, want 68k w/onboard memory & JTAG/BDM
... many programmers would stay with assemblers and C would not ... C masks out the ugly x86 architecture. ... Writing a C compiler for the 68k is peanuts compared to writing one for the x86, since the 68k has a wide set of mostly orthogonal registers, plenty of address registers, and addressing modes ideal for C. Getting the best out of an x86 device is a black art, and it was a long time before C compilers could compete with professional x86 assembler programmers. ... The legacy of assembly on the x86 is one of the reasons why the instruction set is so hideous - it has had to keep 100% binary compatibility because you can't just recompile your assembly code for a new architecture. ...
(comp.arch.embedded) - Re: instruction rescheduler?
... >> I've recently started looking at x86 assembly and I'm still puzzled as ... Are there more advanced optimizing assemblers ... so sticking in optimizations was really just an extension ... But I understand the reluctance many x86 programmers would ...
(comp.lang.asm.x86) - Re: instruction rescheduler?
... > I've recently started looking at x86 assembly and I'm still puzzled ... Are there more advanced optimizing assemblers ... so sticking in optimizations was really just an extension ... But I understand the reluctance many x86 programmers would ...
(comp.lang.asm.x86) |
|
