Re: Betov`s petty war again...?

Haos <caemyr@xxxxxxxxx> écrivait
news:1186814844.987343.234150@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

Just a few points to clarify:

1. Please do not point out misspellings. After being awake for more
than 30h, strange things do happen with me;

Then, go and sleep and shut up, instead of spreading your
deliriums around.


2. In my first post I was referring to
http://www.asmcommunity.net/projects/nasm32/ as a target of Betov`s
attack. I`m not into definitions here.

Which is, since ever, perfectly known by everybody as a
furiously *Anti-GPL* Board. Therefore its name: the Evil
Board.


3. Regarding thread locking:
yes, several threads opened or invaded by Betov in our (ROS) forum
were locked, usually due to massive concentration of libel, unproven
accusations, flame etc.

Libels and accusations done by *who* ?

Do you want me to post the list, with links and all?


On the other hand, he was never banned or in
any way blocked from our media (forum, maillist, irc chan), as a sign
of good will and a glimpse hope that maybe in the future he will
change his attitude. Up to this day, all he could muster, was calling
ROS devs liars and thieves.

Oh! You are too good master.

:)

4. We will still keep our open policy
towards the audit and code control and welcome any opinions on our
code that one would like to state.

Policy, which is?

Welcome, which is?


For example, a part of ROS code
that Betov is publicly naming as "stolen" by us, is openly used by
SanOS (this is where we acquired this code) and SDL. Although we still
are certain nothing is wrong with it, we did contact those projects to
discuss possible actions to take. Just for the peace of mind.

Feel free to explain how Code that is Licenced MicroSoft
can become GPLed.


On the other hand, we will allow being called "thieves", even when the
offender has visible mental issues and no grip with reality.

:)


For the last time, if anyone has any doubts or question concerning
legality or quality of our code, he/she can contact us directly and we
will gladly respond to any questions. Or at least those civilized
ones.

I guess easily that you got lectured, recently, for having
posted here, in the battle-field of ALA, by "somebody above
you". Believe me, boy: The best you could do is to shut up
and to withdraw with your tail in between your legs.


Betov.

< http://rosasm.org >




.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: conspiracy theories/was ADA diabetes research
    ... I have never made such accusations. ... with a forum, and if a person on that forum appeared to be ... making defamatory remarks about your organisation, ... I stand corrected and suitably chastened Kurt. ...
    (alt.support.diabetes)
  • Re: La Wallonie se dégrade ....
    ... >>>il parle encore d'accusations sans preuves alors qu'il a fait des aveux ... >> Pas vu expressis verbis dans les posts que tu as signalés. ... >Tout le monde a pu lire ses aveux sur ce forum toi y compris et d'ailleurs à ...
    (soc.culture.belgium)
  • Re: OT: More on "strong support", "erroneous absolute statements" and poor reading comprehension
    ... Steve and Sandman create. ... in another forum where I discussed legal prescription ... personal attacks that are completely inappropriate. ... and I snipped your accusations against me. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: How crap is this lawyer?
    ... (as indeed he blamed you - but I didn't start making accusations). ... Said kook ... I managed to miss all that (I assume that it was not in this forum). ... as it is the identity of the gateway through which we all post. ...
    (uk.legal)
  • Re: MORE ON MARTY FIKE
    ... >> I've actually been sued for libel before so believe me, ... >> can and cannot say on a forum. ... >scammers, either, but people who work at giving their money away don't ... Many of us, including myself, am in the process of filing charges. ...
    (alt.marketing.online.ebay)