Re: ELF loading
- From: Betov <betov@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 26 Aug 2007 17:59:05 GMT
CodeMonk <jascwa@xxxxxxxxx> écrivait news:LIhAi.45152$Lu.11260
@bignews8.bellsouth.net:
Betov wrote:name
of a user to *learn* anything at all. The job of a user is, as its
says, to *use* a Software, and if a Software's final user has anything
to *learn*, before usign the Soft, the programmer has failed.
Careful !!! :) Even RosAsm's interface is less than intuitive, and
that's from a "final user" assembler programmer's perspective.
Personaly, i do not think that i am a good "designer", but
we (Ludwig and me) did our best with this, and, at my own
taste, it _is_ intuitive enough. Now, RosAsm is not an OS.
It is a Tool for *programmers* - what an OS should not be
supposed to be -. So, admitting that RosAsm would be counter-
intuitive, this would not make any excuse for an OS to also
be counter-intuitive.
Betov.
< http://rosasm.org >
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ELF loading
- From: CodeMonk
- Re: ELF loading
- From: santosh
- Re: ELF loading
- References:
- ELF loading
- From: cmk128
- Re: ELF loading
- From: Frank Kotler
- Re: ELF loading
- From: Betov
- Re: ELF loading
- From: Frank Kotler
- Re: ELF loading
- From: santosh
- Re: ELF loading
- From: Betov
- Re: ELF loading
- From: CodeMonk
- ELF loading
- Prev by Date: Re: ELF loading
- Next by Date: Re: ELF loading
- Previous by thread: Re: ELF loading
- Next by thread: Re: ELF loading
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|