Re: ELF loading

Herbert Kleebauer <klee@xxxxxxxxx> écrivait
news:46D1E060.54D5181F@xxxxxxxxx:

Betov wrote:
Herbert Kleebauer <klee@xxxxxxxxx> ?crivait news:46D1AE4C.C2324A88

Maybe this has nothing to do with "free works" but is because
they don't have to make a living from there work and therefore
are free to make a proper design and don't have to implement
a crappy interface just because the paying user wants it.

How ridiculously arrogant!

You really should start to provide arguments instead of
your opinion.

Under some level of stupidity, i fall short of arguments.
Read what you have written above, Herbert:

1) This has nothing to do with "free works".

2) This is because they don't make money from it.

Where is your logic, on those two points?

2) they don't make money from it.

3) therefore are free to make a proper design.

Translation: The programmers who are payed for a job do
stupidities to please their users, because a user is, by
definition, an idiot. And, all the contrary, a Programmer
who writes for nobody does a god job.

Well, Herbert... congratulations. What do you want me to
comment on that?


Didn't you implement RosAsm's user interface
in a way you prefer and which greatly differs from the
preference of most assembly programmers? How ridiculously arrogant!

From _which_ Assembly Programmer? From you, who prefer your
fancyfooool home made syntax? Who else? Where have you seen
an Assembly Programmer around, who would have some serious
criticisms to tell about RosAsm user interface? Who?

Personally, the last one i heard about, was JohnFound, years
ago. He emmitted a couple of correct remarks, that i have
considered valid, and i have modified the interface accordingly.
And then? Do you have something to say on this topic?

And admitting that RosAsm would not be a good interface, what
relationship with the topic? You disquiet me, Herbert. Are
you ill?

:)

Betov.

< http://rosasm.org >




.