Re: debug and the newbe

On Aug 28, 5:28 pm, "Jean Pierre Daviau" <O...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

for sure this worked. Does it means I should use nasm already?

To be even more specific than what I wrote above, there is generally
no need to do such things in DEBUG. There are a good number of
assemblers out there that make the process much easier, without
sacrificing control.

The only time you should use DEBUG is to actually DEBUG your code
because something isn't executing correctly due to obscure programming
(or even assembler) errors.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Fwd: Re: Debugging symbols with nasm
    ... I'm using nasm to compile some code I wrote. ... but I can't debug it ... GDB is just too good for debugging ASM stuff. ... I recommend ALD, the Assembly ...
    (freebsd-hackers)
  • Re: Debugging symbols with nasm
    ... I'm using nasm to compile some code I wrote. ... but I can't debug it ... GDB is just too good for debugging ASM stuff. ... I recommend ALD, the Assembly ...
    (freebsd-questions)
  • Re: From NASM to Visusal Studio source debugging
    ... >I know NASM can produce the required obj ... >will deliver debug info with this format. ...
    (comp.lang.asm.x86)
  • Re: Debugging symbols with nasm
    ... I'm using nasm to compile some code I wrote. ... but I can't debug it ...
    (freebsd-hackers)
  • Re: thanks for the response to the post below
    ... But I don't see any nasm code but there's code ... for ML and A86 assembler source and C. ... The Linux version looks like ald, with some Nasm code linked into it to do the assembly. ... I've seen another "debug" for Linux, this one written in Nasm. ...
    (comp.lang.asm.x86)