Re: ELF loading

"sevag.krikorian" <sevag.krikorian@xxxxxxxxx> écrivait
news:1188428413.457614.169430@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

RadAsm and HIDE have you beat hands
down.

You probably mean *RadAsm*, because, as far as i can know,
you have written HIDE the very same way your master wrote
an Assembler, didn't you, minion?

:))

Now, is RadAsm better, as an interface than RosAsm's one (?).
This is a question which does not interrest me a lot, but i
took a look at RadAsm Sources Editor (long ago), and it did
not compete: It was just a Text Editor. I also took (same date)
a look at the Resources Editor, and it could not compete either.

I wish the Anti-GPL gang-band to have improved their stuffs,
since then.

:)

Betov.

< http://rosasm.org >


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Tenacity should be rewarded
    ... >> Particularly when the thread he posted is about installing RadAsm. ... Not any Assembler? ... > any Sources Editor? ... Not any Resources Editor? ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: Z80 Assembler / Machine Code
    ... >> Is RadASM the thing to use then? ... >>From a z80 point of view it's just another tabbed text editor. ... >its win32 features are kinda useless for Speccy stuff! ...
    (comp.sys.sinclair)
  • Re: HLA v1.68 is now available
    ... > Ketil adapted RadASM specifically for HLA. ... I wrote "your own IDE and your own Assembler". ... in RosAsm - like RosAsm Equal Pre-Parser, ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: ELF loading
    ... Now, is RadAsm better, as an interface than RosAsm's one. ... For one thing, RadAsm ... So it "doesn't compete". ... a look at the Resources Editor, and it could not compete either. ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: Report from the LuxAsm mailing list for Betov
    ... >> is around 10 years of work, if you come with a working LuxAsm ... RadAsm sure didn't take that long. ... Assembler. ... In no way an Integrated Debugger, ...
    (alt.lang.asm)