Re: Gonzales, Another one bites the dust.

On Sep 3, 7:17 pm, hutch-- <hu...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Awe diddums,

Poor Keith is still feeling left out of it after members left his
forum in droves.

You can keep masquerading the facts, but it doesn't change the reality
of things.

The reality of things is you treating Rob Rice like a piece of sh*t
just like you did with a whole heap of your members and then sat there
confused when the left in droves.

Was this before, or after your attempts to turn the community into a
trash heap and create massive amounts of drama-prone threads?

Don't attribute to me, what subversive tactics only someone like you
can perform without conscience.

snip bullsh*t] it amplifies the disgust in how you bait-n-trapped
Ratch into one of your little one-sided political shunning sessions.

Ratch did not need your definition of "bait-n-trapped". he was more
than capable of getting himself banned for persistent rule violation
without your help at all.

Actually, he does. According to the rules of conduct, he should have
never expected to be fully banned at whim just because *you* don't
agree with his political views... especially in politically-based
threads that you initiated. If you really wanted to spew your inane
political prattle without baiting members, you would make such a forum
read-only to normal users and fore-go the selective rule enforcement.

However, this is nothing new. You tried pulling the same stuff at the,
then, Win32ASM Community. Fortunately, the other moderators kept you
from successfully capitalizing on your power-trip... hence bailing out
and establishing masm forum.

So you still see your power-trip as an attempt by others to perform a
coup on who releases MASM32. It is just as an pathetic excuse now as
it was then.

Is this why you tried to get Paul Brennick's rights to use MASM from
him by stealth while he was very sick ?


I never requested, or attempted to gain, such a right. Unlike you, I
left Paul to make his own decisions. As soon as you got wind of a
package that could rival MASM32, for whatever little *that* is worth,
you stopped calling Paul a "Wise Monkey" and re-opened *respectful*
lines of communication... and he bought in to your comfortable lies.

The only thing that I requested, was that if I was going to back
Paul's MASM615 contribution, that there'd better be solid proof from
Microsoft that such redistribution (authorized distribution) is legal
and I asked him what to do in case he passes away. Now, I know you are
going to pull your backyard-lawyer bit in response to this, but you
are not an authority on jack-*** and your words are not to be trusted
as compared to more respectable and authoritative figures. Paul
actually mustered-up a letter of intent, which was a "good faith"
clause that I would most likely not have to worry about legal issues
in hosting such a project. This was good enough for me to continue.

You should have learned from Paul, as how to reassure users of your
package that what they are doing is legal. You certainly learned
recently, from ALA none-the-less, that Microsoft is located in Redmond
and not Seattle... adding reassurance is not much more of a learning
curve ;)

You can go ahead and gloat at the fact that such an aspiring project
has been aborted and the MASM615 portion, now called "GeneSys", has
been doomed to obscurity and will forever remain in the shadows of
MASM32. Your fear of losing your only pathetic mark on this world is
has thus been alleviated.

I'd hate to break this to you, but there is no "power" obtained in
releasing MASM32, or determining who releases MASM32... [snip more bullsh*t]

Did you only realise this AFTER you failed to get Paul Brennick's
rights to use MASM ?

Did you think I would not notice the discrete attitude change that
occurred in Paul soon after the start of the Win32ASM Project? Did you
not think I could tell the difference between Paul's genuine words and
your words passing through him? Do you think I don't realize that Paul
was eventually acting as a proxy and he was giving you information
about what was happening within our administration? Unfortunately, you
were more interested in our internal operations and your own agenda in
crushing Win32ASM and MASM615 instead of my conversations with Paul...
and that is why your ignorance about the subject blossoms.

Here is what *Paul* proposed to *me* over PM...

"As far as licensing goes when I pass on (I am pragmatic, also), I
believe that the people at Microsoft understand these things and they
do not expect or desire the project to die with me. There 'is' an
unnamed partner in my letter, most think it is Erol but actually it
was Manos. The original project was Manos and myself. I added Erol
and Manos left in a funk. Anyway, you could very easily be that other
person and when you look closely at the wording, it could legally be
said that I was negotiating for two people (in fact, this is a true
statement). So, why don't you become the unnamed partner? Erol has
no desire to do that, he is content to make console apps which he does
well.

We will never be able to convince other members you are that guy but
Microsoft is unaware of our rocky start and Microsoft is all you will
have to convince.

Nobody, except Erol, knows about Manos so we can lead others to
believe that I was thinking ahead and named a yet to be chosen
successor. You can start making 'noises' along those lines, you can
sell 'that' I think."

My response was for Paul to do whatever he thinks needs to be done. I
would not make the decision for him.

So, once again Steveo, what goes on inside your head and reality don't
quite mix.

Go ahead and also feel proud of the fact that you permanently buried
any interest of mine in helping people use MASM. I am really glad, in
hindsight, that the Win32ASM Project never got to a first release. All
that "extra" work I performed (and that *no one* knows of even to this
day) as a surprise to Paul for the initial release is now for me to
use for stuff that I believe in.

You also seem to forget that, personally, I have no use for MASM, as I
use NASM. So blow your smoke elsewhere.

As long as you supply the mirrors, I will blow smaoke at them.

Foolish. The wise would take the mirror and study the reflection for
greater knowledge and understanding. You choose to act the fool, and
that will be your *true* mark on this world.

Unlike you, I have actually contributed quality programming effort
towards an assembly language project.

Yes we have all notice that it has taken the world by storm.

Still avoiding the fact that you are essentially taking the credit for
the work of others?

When is the last time I saw headlines stating that MASM32 was "taking
the world by storm"... oh... right... never. Even with pharming the
hard work of others, you still only managed to secure an obscure radar
blip in the programming world. Unlike you, I am happy with my amateur
programming endeavors... and they don't have to "take the world by
storm" for me to stay happy.

However, I would really like to see an overall usage comparison
between NASM and MASM32... or are you going to cop-out on the
"statistics mean nothing" obfuscation again?

I am sorry that your lack of
programming skill keeps you from experiencing such an achievement
outside of pharming the code of others.

I gather this is from your experience of taking the world by storm ?

No, this comes from actual programming experience. My capability to
take documentation/specs/etc... and express them with a programming
language. Between NASM, NASM32, XBOX Development, 16-bit and 32-bit
Operating System Development, 64-bit development, MIPS endeavors and
developing an assembler... you can't go wrong in seeing that my
programming skills are way beyond your rudimentary PowerBASIC
capabilities.

If you haven't figured it out Steve, or in case you have been hanging
around newbies too long, this is what it means to be a programmer. You
can keep projecting your hutch-- persona, but in reality... you are
not a programmer... and never will be. Deal with it.

I am sorry that you have to
have others spoon-feed you source code for you to understand and
accept methods due to your lack of programming capability outside of
PowerBASIC and Iczelion's Tutorials.

You know someone who can spoon feed me PowerBASIC code ? let me know
who it is.

Does Jeremy Collake (an ex virus writer) and him spoon-feeding you the
assembly language implementation of the Boyer-Moore algorithm

Are you so desperate that you have to defame Jeremy Collake ? RE: the
BM algo I was in fact "spoon fed" the details by Bob Boyer who is a
genuinely nice guy. Better whip out that egg scraper to clean your
face up.

Nice masquerade. You essentially side-stepped having to address the
fact ath Jeremy spoon-fed you the code by applying an indirect
statement.

I talked about the actual *implementation* in assembly language, not
the details.

And herein lies the folly of a bad mannered script kiddie
pontificating at a whole host of people who have already abandoned his
forum because of his abuse of members.

Masquerade at will, but reality is not affected.

Nothing to "Masquerade" about your treatment of Rob Rice, you treated
him like a piece of sh*t.

What about how you treated Ratch? No guilt? No apologies? Ego too big?
*** too small to fill the pants of your predecessors?

Seriously, just level with us in your psychological issues and most
here would honestly help you.

As for the constant "script kiddie" remarks... last time I checked...
you were the one using PowerBASIC as a primary development tool.

Yes I could be wrong, a MIRC script would be a bit complex for you. As
Betov sobs into his chardonnay over PowerBASIC, you can sob into your
lemonade as it turn to bitter lemon. If you cannot manage a MIRC
script a PowerBASIC compiler would just be too powerful for you.


Maybe you are right.

Then again, maybe your ignorance is blaring again due to the fact
that, and since you brought up IRC of all things, I wrote and used my
own "Eggdrop" in PERL years ago to keep my OS development channel
open. Last time I checked, PERL is a just wee-bit more complicated to
learn than PowerBASIC.

However, this simple type of scripting has not appealed to me for
quite some time and I aspire to challenge myself. For me, that means
moving closer and closer to the machine level. For you, that *still*
means trying to master PowerBASIC and Iczelion's Tutorials.

Don't lash out at other people just because you are essentially an
autistic programmer.

.