Re: Skybuck's Wolfram (Turing-Like) Machine implementation
- From: //\\\\o//\\\\annabee <w@xxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 14:09:35 +0200
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 13:26:48 +0200, Skybuck Flying <spam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
After reading somebodie's else bull*** in another unrelated thread I was
under the impression that pred and succ automatically wrap around, that's
not the case.
Kwuaaaque Kwuaaaque Kwuaaaque Kwuaeeeeque Kwuaaeeeeeaqu! :D :D
(beware of the rythm)
(Note: untested but should work ;) :))
works fine here..
Kwuaaaque
;-D
Bye,
Skybuck.
.
- Prev by Date: Re: FASMLIB 0.7.0 is out
- Next by Date: Re: Skybuck's Wolfram (Turing-Like) Machine implementation
- Previous by thread: Rational behind removing register forms of inc, dec?
- Next by thread: Re: Skybuck's Wolfram (Turing-Like) Machine implementation
- Index(es):
