Re: Skybuck's Wolfram (Turing-Like) Machine implementation
- From: santosh <santosh.k83@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 13:01:22 +0530
Orlando B. Salazar wrote:
santosh wrote:
> Orlando B. Salazar wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>> You just couldn't refuse ending your post without taking a stab at
>> HLA. So, now you must reap what you have sown;
>
> Which is?
>
>> now you pay the
>> consequences for your mistake.
>
> How?
>
Why do you think I am beholden to give an answer to you for anything
I do or say?
What else /do/ we do on Usenet?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Skybuck's Wolfram (Turing-Like) Machine implementation
- From: Orlando B. Salazar
- Re: Skybuck's Wolfram (Turing-Like) Machine implementation
- References:
- Re: Skybuck's Wolfram (Turing-Like) Machine implementation
- From: Orlando B. Salazar
- Re: Skybuck's Wolfram (Turing-Like) Machine implementation
- Prev by Date: Re: Skybuck's Wolfram (Turing-Like) Machine implementation
- Next by Date: Efficiency
- Previous by thread: Re: Skybuck's Wolfram (Turing-Like) Machine implementation
- Next by thread: Re: Skybuck's Wolfram (Turing-Like) Machine implementation
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|