Re: Skybuck's Wolfram (Turing-Like) Machine implementation
- From: "Orlando B. Salazar" <obsalazar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:36:58 -0400
santosh wrote:
Orlando B. Salazar wrote:
santosh wrote:
> Orlando B. Salazar wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>> You just couldn't refuse ending your post without taking a stab at
>> HLA. So, now you must reap what you have sown;
>
> Which is?
>
>> now you pay the
>> consequences for your mistake.
>
> How?
>
Why do you think I am beholden to give an answer to you for anything
I do or say?
What else /do/ we do on Usenet?
Are you that desperate to engage in a colloquy?
Having gone over just a few of your posts, here in alt.lang.asm, as well
as in comp.lang.c, I've noticed that they do tend to have more of an
uncomplimentary and pejorative slant to them than an overall favorable
or helpful one. (Evidently, it must come with the Rosasm package. 8-) )
I've also noticed that your posts receive a minimum of responses, if
any. And the few responses that you do receive are nothing more than
attempts at correcting errors in your logic, or else back-handed slaps
for the condescending arrogance you displayed, to which you usually
meekly saunter off, and have nothing more to say.
Again, I must ask, is it really that vital that you take part in a
discussion?
Regards,
Orlando B. Salazar
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: Skybuck's Wolfram (Turing-Like) Machine implementation
- From: Orlando B. Salazar
- Re: Skybuck's Wolfram (Turing-Like) Machine implementation
- From: santosh
- Re: Skybuck's Wolfram (Turing-Like) Machine implementation
- Prev by Date: Re: Efficiency
- Next by Date: Re: Skybuck's Wolfram (Turing-Like) Machine implementation
- Previous by thread: Re: Skybuck's Wolfram (Turing-Like) Machine implementation
- Next by thread: Re: Skybuck's Wolfram (Turing-Like) Machine implementation
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|