Re: Skybuck's Wolfram (Turing-Like) Machine implementation
- From: Betov <betov@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 26 Oct 2007 19:11:50 GMT
santosh <santosh.k83@xxxxxxxxx> écrivait news:fftd9r$3b8$1
@registered.motzarella.org:
(Evidently, it must come with the Rosasm
package. 8-) )
Er no. You should rid yourself of this apparently unhealthy RosAsm
obsession. My assembler of choice is NASM.
:]]
You know, if you don't want to be called a RosAsm user, i am
afraid you will have no choice but being on the wrong side,
to please all of the trolls around, Santosh.
:]]]]]
Betov.
< http://rosasm.org >
.
- References:
- Re: Skybuck's Wolfram (Turing-Like) Machine implementation
- From: Orlando B. Salazar
- Re: Skybuck's Wolfram (Turing-Like) Machine implementation
- From: santosh
- Re: Skybuck's Wolfram (Turing-Like) Machine implementation
- From: Orlando B. Salazar
- Re: Skybuck's Wolfram (Turing-Like) Machine implementation
- From: santosh
- Re: Skybuck's Wolfram (Turing-Like) Machine implementation
- Prev by Date: Re: Skybuck's Wolfram (Turing-Like) Machine implementation
- Next by Date: Re: Skybuck's Wolfram (Turing-Like) Machine implementation
- Previous by thread: Re: Skybuck's Wolfram (Turing-Like) Machine implementation
- Next by thread: Re: Skybuck's Wolfram (Turing-Like) Machine implementation
- Index(es):