Re: Skybuck's Wolfram (Turing-Like) Machine implementation

santosh wrote:
Orlando B. Salazar wrote:

santosh wrote:
Orlando B. Salazar wrote:

santosh wrote:
> Orlando B. Salazar wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>> You just couldn't refuse ending your post without taking a stab
>> at HLA. So, now you must reap what you have sown;
>
> Which is?
>
>> now you pay the
>> consequences for your mistake.
>
> How?
>

Why do you think I am beholden to give an answer to you for anything
I do or say?
What else /do/ we do on Usenet?

Are you that desperate to engage in a colloquy?

Having gone over just a few of your posts, here in alt.lang.asm, as
well as in comp.lang.c, I've noticed that they do tend to have more of
an uncomplimentary and pejorative slant to them than an overall
favorable or helpful one.

At least I have contributed a *few* helpful posts.

So, you admit to having posted only a "few helpful posts"?
In that case, answer your own question, "What else /do/ we do on Usenet?"


On the other hand _all_ your posts under this handle that I can find
through Google Groups seem to be attempts to insult other posters.

(Evidently, it must come with the Rosasm package. 8-) )

Er no. You should rid yourself of this apparently unhealthy RosAsm
obsession. My assembler of choice is NASM.

I've also noticed that your posts receive a minimum of responses, if
any.

That's because, unlike you, my posts are generally helpful replies to
questions from beginners, not attempts to troll.

That's not true. You'd like to believe it's true though, wouldn't you?


And the few responses that you do receive are nothing more than attempts at correcting errors in your logic, or else back-handed slaps
for the condescending arrogance you displayed, to which you usually
meekly saunter off, and have nothing more to say.

You figured all this out from looking at a few messages? Impressive. In
any case do believe whatever you want.

Again, I must ask, is it really that vital that you take part in a
discussion?

Not with you certainly not, now that it's clear you are Just Another
Troll/Sockpuppet.

You play the "Troll card" hoping that will nullify everything I've said?

Poor little santosh. He has no friends that will play with him. :(


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Skybucks Wolfram (Turing-Like) Machine implementation
    ... Granted, Wolfgang's slap at HLA had little to do with Skybuck's idea, or the "default response". ... Tough to tell the inmates apart without a program, around here, but in my observation, Santosh is quite "well liked". ... (Skybuck might be interested in the c.l.a.x. ... And santosh has confessed to being a NASM user, which, I see, you are #3 on the Development Team. ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: An HLA question...
    ... santosh wrote: ... want absolutely *zero* extra code generated by HLA. ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
    ... santosh wrote: ... standard library is written in HLA, so, you would need to know HLA in ... got the goddam operands "backwards", but otherwise it pretty much does what it looks like it does. ...
    (alt.lang.asm)