Re: Skybuck's Wolfram (Turing-Like) Machine implementation

Frank Kotler wrote:
Orlando B. Salazar wrote:

....
You play the "Troll card" hoping that will nullify everything I've said?

Or perhaps "everything you've said" has drawn forth the troll card? Granted, Wolfgang's slap at HLA had little to do with Skybuck's (weird but amusing, as usual) idea, or the "default response". So... of course you've gotta bash RosAsm...

Poor little santosh. He has no friends that will play with him. :(

I think you're confused. Santosh is neither the source nor the target of the venom for which this NG has become famous, usually. Tough to tell the inmates apart without a program, around here, but in my observation, Santosh is quite "well liked". (if you think that's important...)

(Skybuck might be interested in the c.l.a.x. discussion of the IBM 1620 - apparently keeps it's "sign bit" separate from the "value", and works on arbitrarily long digit strings... weird, like Skybuck likes it! :)

Best,
Frank

And santosh has confessed to being a NASM user, which, I see, you are #3 on the Development Team. So, of course, you've got to say what you say.
Nothing's being said that can't be predicted, that's not preprogrammed.


Regards,
Orlando B. Salazar

PS. By the way, I also use NASM. But I used HLA to learn assembly.



.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Skybucks Wolfram (Turing-Like) Machine implementation
    ... >> You just couldn't refuse ending your post without taking a stab ... >> at HLA. ... Poor little santosh. ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: An HLA question...
    ... santosh wrote: ... want absolutely *zero* extra code generated by HLA. ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: newbie: I/O with nasm
    ... santosh wrote: ... standard library is written in HLA, so, you would need to know HLA in ... got the goddam operands "backwards", but otherwise it pretty much does what it looks like it does. ...
    (alt.lang.asm)