Re: Seperate asm/assemblers newsgroups would be better ! ;)
- From: "Skybuck Flying" <spam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 09:48:43 +0200
Even better would be:
alt.lang.asm.rosasm
alt.lang.asm.nasm
For newbies it's then clear that both are assembler languages/tools.
Bye,
Skybuck.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Seperate asm/assemblers newsgroups would be better ! ;)
- From: H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Seperate asm/assemblers newsgroups would be better ! ;)
- References:
- Re: Skybuck's Wolfram (Turing-Like) Machine implementation
- From: Orlando B. Salazar
- Re: Skybuck's Wolfram (Turing-Like) Machine implementation
- From: santosh
- Re: Skybuck's Wolfram (Turing-Like) Machine implementation
- From: Orlando B. Salazar
- Re: Skybuck's Wolfram (Turing-Like) Machine implementation
- From: santosh
- Re: Skybuck's Wolfram (Turing-Like) Machine implementation
- From: Orlando B. Salazar
- Re: Skybuck's Wolfram (Turing-Like) Machine implementation
- From: Frank Kotler
- Re: Skybuck's Wolfram (Turing-Like) Machine implementation
- From: Orlando B. Salazar
- Seperate asm/assemblers newsgroups would be better ! ;)
- From: Skybuck Flying
- Re: Skybuck's Wolfram (Turing-Like) Machine implementation
- Prev by Date: Seperate asm/assemblers newsgroups would be better ! ;)
- Next by Date: Re: Slow nasm
- Previous by thread: Seperate asm/assemblers newsgroups would be better ! ;)
- Next by thread: Re: Seperate asm/assemblers newsgroups would be better ! ;)
- Index(es):