Re: Skybuck's Wolfram (Turing-Like) Machine implementation

Frank Kotler wrote:

Orlando B. Salazar wrote:

...
And santosh has confessed to being a NASM user,

Confessed? I thought he was braggin'!

Not even that. I had to correct our latest troll's misconception that
anyone who agrees/supports with Betov/Wolfgang/etc _must_ be a RosAsm
user.

So, of course, you've got to say what you say.
Nothing's being said that can't be predicted, that's not
preprogrammed.

The funny thing is, I figured you'd call me on supporting Santosh just
because he's a Nasm user. Which proves your point. Maybe we could just
use equates... or bitflags...

You know, this troll *strongly* reminds me of another one we had a few
months ago which went by the handle of "Bodhi" or a variation of that.

:)

<snip>

.