Re: Skybuck's Wolfram (Turing-Like) Machine implementation


"Orlando B. Salazar" replied:

Frank Kotler wrote:
....
You play the "Troll card" hoping that will nullify everything I've said?

Or perhaps "everything you've said" has drawn forth the troll card?
Granted, Wolfgang's slap at HLA had little to do with Skybuck's (weird
but amusing, as usual) idea, or the "default response". So... of course
you've gotta bash RosAsm...

Sure, 'my thing' with RH and HLA is an almost personally issue,
I just can't stand illogcal...stupid 'professors'.

Poor little santosh. He has no friends that will play with him. :(

Regular posters of this NG aren't neccessarely friends, they behave
more like members of a big family ;)

I think you're confused. Santosh is neither the source nor the target of
the venom for which this NG has become famous, usually. Tough to tell
the inmates apart without a program, around here, but in my observation,
Santosh is quite "well liked". (if you think that's important...)

(Skybuck might be interested in the c.l.a.x. discussion of the IBM 1620
- apparently keeps it's "sign bit" separate from the "value", and works
on arbitrarily long digit strings... weird, like Skybuck likes it! :)

And santosh has confessed to being a NASM user, which, I see, you are #3
on the Development Team. So, of course, you've got to say what you say.
Nothing's being said that can't be predicted, that's not preprogrammed.

This is for sure not at all a cause, if you'd read this group more often
you'll see that NASM-,RosAsm-,Windela-,Kesys- and other users/developers
here share experience and help newbies and each other most of the time.

PS. By the way, I also use NASM. But I used HLA to learn assembly.

I see.
__
wolfgang



.