Re: Slow nasm
- From: Herbert Kleebauer <klee@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 18:23:22 +0200
Betov wrote:
(a well designed
assembler doesn't only look at the instructions the programmer gives
it to assemble but analyses the complete program and replaces a slow
algorithm itself by a faster one)
? You saying that ?
Sorry, but i never heard of any Assembler optimizing anything.
I suppose you did not wrote what you had in mind... Or, are
you drunk ?
Because of the other posts
But I used HLA to learn assembly.
HLA is a perfect tool for learning how to program in Assembly Language.
The code is working OK for small DLLs but if bigger, application is
freezing. Is (code generated by) nasm so slow
I thought this is the fairytale day in a.l.a
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Slow nasm
- From: Betov
- Re: Slow nasm
- References:
- Slow nasm
- From: volcano
- Re: Slow nasm
- From: santosh
- Re: Slow nasm
- From: Herbert Kleebauer
- Re: Slow nasm
- From: Betov
- Re: Slow nasm
- From: Herbert Kleebauer
- Re: Slow nasm
- From: Betov
- Slow nasm
- Prev by Date: Re: Skybuck's Wolfram (Turing-Like) Machine implementation
- Next by Date: Re: Slow nasm
- Previous by thread: Re: Slow nasm
- Next by thread: Re: Slow nasm
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|