Re: Slow nasm
- From: Betov <betov@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Oct 2007 18:36:59 GMT
Keith Kanios <keith@xxxxxxxxxx> écrivait news:1193507237.003682.47790
@o3g2000hsb.googlegroups.com:
There is a slight logical flaw going on here in assuming that NASM is
the problem.
The most important logical flaws, here, are the ones in
your diseased head, when re-distributing NASM, without
the Sources, and without noticing the LGPL, under the
name of NASM32, in order to try to compete with the MASM32,
as illegaly redistributed by your good old Hutch brother.
Fix this, before fixing the OP bugs, small head. (And pull
your trowsers up, next time you will have to bend down).
Betov.
< http://rosasm.org >
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Slow nasm
- From: Terence
- Re: Slow nasm
- References:
- Slow nasm
- From: volcano
- Re: Slow nasm
- From: santosh
- Re: Slow nasm
- From: Herbert Kleebauer
- Re: Slow nasm
- From: Betov
- Re: Slow nasm
- From: Herbert Kleebauer
- Re: Slow nasm
- From: Betov
- Re: Slow nasm
- From: Herbert Kleebauer
- Re: Slow nasm
- From: Betov
- Re: Slow nasm
- From: Keith Kanios
- Slow nasm
- Prev by Date: Re: Skybuck's Wolfram (Turing-Like) Machine implementation
- Next by Date: Re: Seperate asm/assemblers newsgroups would be better ! ;)
- Previous by thread: Re: Slow nasm
- Next by thread: Re: Slow nasm
- Index(es):