Re: Seperate asm/assemblers newsgroups would be better ! ;)
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 14:23:13 -0700
Skybuck Flying wrote:
Even better would be:
alt.lang.asm.rosasm
alt.lang.asm.nasm
For newbies it's then clear that both are assembler languages/tools.
comp.lang.asm.x86.{rosasm,nasm,...} would be even better.
-hpa
.
- References:
- Re: Skybuck's Wolfram (Turing-Like) Machine implementation
- From: Orlando B. Salazar
- Re: Skybuck's Wolfram (Turing-Like) Machine implementation
- From: santosh
- Re: Skybuck's Wolfram (Turing-Like) Machine implementation
- From: Orlando B. Salazar
- Re: Skybuck's Wolfram (Turing-Like) Machine implementation
- From: santosh
- Re: Skybuck's Wolfram (Turing-Like) Machine implementation
- From: Orlando B. Salazar
- Re: Skybuck's Wolfram (Turing-Like) Machine implementation
- From: Frank Kotler
- Re: Skybuck's Wolfram (Turing-Like) Machine implementation
- From: Orlando B. Salazar
- Seperate asm/assemblers newsgroups would be better ! ;)
- From: Skybuck Flying
- Re: Seperate asm/assemblers newsgroups would be better ! ;)
- From: Skybuck Flying
- Re: Skybuck's Wolfram (Turing-Like) Machine implementation
- Prev by Date: Re: Slow nasm
- Next by Date: Re: Skybuck's Wolfram (Turing-Like) Machine implementation
- Previous by thread: Re: Seperate asm/assemblers newsgroups would be better ! ;)
- Next by thread: Re: Skybuck's Wolfram (Turing-Like) Machine implementation
- Index(es):