Re: Nasm Error

Frank Kotler wrote:
Seems a rather "exotic" platform to move development to. What's the advantage?

Best,
Frank

Thanks for the reply Frank, I am writing a Hobby OS. All of the bootloader, second stage stuff is written with Nasm, all of the kernel is written in Watcom C, with the odd Wasm module linked into it. I was doing this all previously under DOS.

GCC isnt an option for me, it would be too much of a headache to convert everything over, and the GNU assemblers horrible at&t syntax is something I want to stay as far away as I can from.

As Watcom and Nasm appeared to be on the OS/2 platform, and I had a spare box with the operating system doing nothing, I thought "why not".

I wanted to keep the same tools but move platforms.

Cheers
.