Re: Nasm Error
- From: Frank Kotler <fbkotler@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 04:48:38 GMT
fred smith wrote:
Frank Kotler wrote:
If you feel like zipping up those .exe's and sending 'em to me - fbkotler@xxxxxxxxxxx - I could put 'em up on SF. It would be nice if hpa's buildbot could do it (I'm really impressed by that!). Any idea what the problem could be?
As you see, Nasm is "user supported" these days. Since we haven't got many OS/2 users, your feedback is especially appreciated!
Best,
Frank
Only too happy to help :-) I'll send them up to you shortly.
That would be great. I just made the "release" of 2.00 on SourceForge (hope we're not jumping the gun!). I put the OS/2 build from Zytor there, but made it "hidden" (to match what I did with 2.00rc3 and prior)(I didn't "send notice" - 2 people watching it). If you'll send me executables, I'll put 'em up there. A "brand new" build that reports version as "2.00" instead of "2.00rc3" would be nice, but I don't think there's much difference...
Thanks for your help, and thanks to the others - Keith, H. Peter Anvin (of rPath, Inc.!), and Chuck Crayne... Andreas Ericsson helped clue me in how to work "git", too - who made Nasm 2.00 a reality!!!
Best,
Frank
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Nasm Error
- From: Betov
- Re: Nasm Error
- References:
- Nasm Error
- From: fred smith
- Re: Nasm Error
- From: H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Nasm Error
- From: fred smith
- Re: Nasm Error
- From: H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Nasm Error
- From: fred smith
- Re: Nasm Error
- From: Frank Kotler
- Re: Nasm Error
- From: fred smith
- Nasm Error
- Prev by Date: [OT] Re: Will female robots take plastic?? (A call for kicking female programmers out of computing)
- Next by Date: Re: NASM 2.00 is Here!!!
- Previous by thread: Re: Nasm Error
- Next by thread: Re: Nasm Error
- Index(es):