Re: Nasm Error


Betov wrote:

[..about NASM 2.00..]

Great. Too bad it is C *** defeating the purpose of writing
anything in Assembly.

Yeah, I also cannot compile it, because I don't have any C-tool
installed and this status may remain forever...

But I downloaded the C-source and Frank's C-style is somehow good
readable [ASM-influenced?] for me, so I can see how/why/when NASM
will work.
So this will help me to figure out how L'unix should be treated ...

Perhaps I once write a C-compiler for KESYS, or just a smart script
converter. I'd estimate it could produce final files with at least
100:1 source/code-size ratio without loosing execution speed.

__
wolfgang



.

Quantcast